/de/crypto/exchange · exchange ranking · methodology v2.1

The trust picture for crypto exchanges in Germany

Independent composite scores synthesised from public review feeds and regulatory data, pinned to methodology v2.1.

Trust snapshot· the rigour behind the ranking

How we score →

brands rated

signals analysed

0 filtered · spam / low-quality

pending

last update

Scales in this marketnot comparable across verticals

Scale cards appear once this market has a ranked cohort.

What we measure

FPAFiat payouts
STRSecurity track record
FTRFees transparency
SQUSupport quality
KFRKYC friction
FRAFiat ramps
ABRAsset breadth
RCORegulatory compliance
PUXPlatform UX

Anatomy of a scored ranking row

Every part of a ranked row maps to one data field. The row is the same component used across all scored leaderboards.

#PartWhat it is · source field

1RankWithin-scale position only — never cross-scale. rank_in_scale

2Brand tileDeterministic initials, neutral ink. No logo, no affiliate signal. brand.slug

3Name + verticalsBrand and the verticals it operates. brand.verticals[]

4Licence chipLicensed / blocked, from the regulator register. licence.status

5Score + CIComposite and ± interval; the honesty around the point. score · ci

6Scale barHeat-ramp position on the 0–10 evidence scale. score → heat

7Signals lineSignal count and last-updated time. n_signals · updated_at

8Aspect cardsTop aspects, score + review count; ▲ marks a concern (<5). aspect_ratings[]

9CTAsOfficial site ↗ (F2-suppressible) · See details →. firewall_suppressed

▲ on an aspect marks a concern (score < 5). The «Official site ↗» CTA is suppressed for firewalled brands (F2 · ADR 0072); «See details →» always renders.

Coverage in progressCrypto exchanges appear here once promoted into the rating.

No regulator-grade source covers exchange solvency or conduct; the strongest independent anchor is AML-only registration.

indexfair