Skip to main content

Bet St George

UK · Sportsbook
expected range 4.76.2 · 57 signals
IndexFair evidence score · UK sportsbook ·
Official website
betstgeorge.comLicence verified · UKGC

The destination is matched to the current register record.

Official website
External link · not a recommendationAbout this link

External link to the operator's own site. IndexFair does not recommend where you play or bet — we publish the score and leave the visit decision to you.

Not a recommendation. Compare only with brands in the same country/category.

Methodology
Updated
2 days ago
Licence
✓ UKGC
Technical details
Scale
IF-GB-SB-2Scores comparable only within this scale — country × category × method version.
Percentile
Confidence
normal · ±0.7
What this means
The interval shows how much the score may move as more evidence arrives. A wider interval means the current evidence base is thinner or less consistent.
Per-vertical · two separate scales — not comparable to each other
SportsbookIF-GB-SB-2
5.54.76.2
· n 28 brands

Footnote: each vertical is read only against its own cohort.

Score history · pre-ruler snapshot basis · last 90 days

Awaiting trend data

lowest of 28UK sportsbook

calibrated against 28 ranked peers

How to read this score

Evidence index, not a quality score — comparable only within UK sportsbook (same category, jurisdiction & methodology major version). The number summarizes what independent evidence shows, weighted and filtered by a fixed method; it does not grade taste, value or experience beyond what the evidence measures.

15.5/10 summarizes licence records, user signals and measured operations.
2Compare only within UK sportsbook — other countries and categories use different scales.
3The range 4.76.2 shows how far the score may move as evidence grows.
All markets tracked for Bet St George
Transitional certification basis

Transitional scale — this category is published under a transitional certification basis while its weight set completes certification.

Bet St George is a sportsbook licensed in the United Kingdom. Its IndexFair score is 5.5/10, drawn from 33 reviews used out of 38 collected across 3 sources.

Trust summary

Why this score

5.5/10Expected score range: 4.76.2 · higher confidence as evidence growsEvidence confidence: High
What this means

The interval shows how much the score may move as more evidence arrives. A wider interval means the current evidence base is thinner or less consistent.

Where this score sits28 GB sportsbooks · v2.1
Bet St George 5.5
lowest 3.5median 5.1highest 7.2

Each cell is one ranked GB sportsbook, lowest → highest. Bet St George is 8th of 28 — higher than 74%.

Comparable only within this list.

Highest overall-aligned aspect projection
----
Lowest overall-aligned aspect projection
----

Each aspect numeral is a counterfactual published score with other blocks and the market ruler held constant, so it can differ from the overall score.

Evidence details3 sources UKGC Account 67818updated 26 Jul 2026
Sources3
Signals used57
LicenceUK Gambling Commission
Updated26 Jul 2026
How we score →v2.1
Score decompositionComposite 5.5
Independent attestation9.1

What independent audits and attestations agree on — no regulator licence register exists for this leaf.

UK Gambling Commission record
User experience2.7

What review sources report — review signals screened for spam and weighted for time.

n 33 used · 0 filtered out

Experience signals for this market draw on the brand’s review evidence across markets; region-attributed reviews alone are not yet numerous enough (fewer than 30) to score this market separately.

Operations0.0

What operators do when things go wrong — reply to negative reviews and resolve logged complaints.

Independent review sources disagree on this brand — a confidence signal, not scored into the composite. See where →
honest output · shadowinternal — does not change the published score

Honest-output substrate pending for Bet St George.

Aspect snapshot · all dimensions at a glance
UX quality42%
No signal yet
Payouts26%
No signal yet
Bonuses Fairness12%
No signal yet
Support9%
No signal yet
KYC6%
No signal yet
02 / 08

Aspect breakdown

6 brand-level experience dimensions · methodology weights
6 dimensions

Experience

· 6 aspects · 100% of methodology weightacross sportsbook

This number is an overall-aligned projection, not a standalone quality rating for this aspect. It shows the published cell score if all user-experience evidence matched this aspect while the other blocks and the market ruler stayed fixed. A same-aspect comparison between brands still embeds each brand’s other blocks; the evidence tier drives the order of aspect-sorted lists, not this projected number.

UX · w 42%#ux-quality
UX quality
Insufficient signal · below the 30-signal aspect floor
IndexFair analysis

The overall experience of using the site and app — stability, navigation, speed, mobile quality, and how the betting and gaming features feel to use.

PAY · w 26%#payouts
Payouts
Insufficient signal · below the 30-signal aspect floor
IndexFair analysis

How fast and reliably the operator settles withdrawals.

BON · w 12%#bonuses
Bonuses Fairness
Insufficient signal · below the 30-signal aspect floor
IndexFair analysis

Bonus terms, wagering requirements and clarity of T&Cs.

SUP · w 9%#support
Support
Insufficient signal · below the 30-signal aspect floor
IndexFair analysis

Availability and quality of customer service channels.

KYC · w 6%#verification
KYC
Insufficient signal · below the 30-signal aspect floor
IndexFair analysis

Frequency and severity of identity-verification re-requests.

Responsible gambling
Insufficient signal · below the 30-signal aspect floor
IndexFair analysis

Self-exclusion, deposit and time limits, and GAMSTOP integration.

How 38 collected signals became 33 usable ones:

Signal funnel87% used
Collected from all sources38
Met detail/relevance bar33
Set aside5
Set aside · 5
No gradeable aspect4
Likely fake or duplicate1
Used in score · 3 sources33

33 of 38 collected reviews met our detail and relevance bar and counted toward the score. The remaining 5 were set aside before scoring — too short, off-topic, non-English, or flagged as likely fake.

Sportsbook

scores higher than 1%of UK sportsbook brands — a position, not a gradecohort forming — percentile activates at 5 ranked peers

Independent analysis of public signals; no affiliation or endorsement.

How we calculate

A source-weighted consumer-signal score from dated records, complaints, reported experiences, and measured facts. Not a star average and not a quality score. It does not reproduce full reviews; reported experience is not a finding of misconduct. Full methodology.

3 sources · Data as of 26 Jul 2026
Measured productHow this is graded
Market margin
6.6%Goodoverround · lower is better · Measured on Tennis

Market breadth not yet measured for this sportsbook.

These measures feed the Sportsbook score · How this is graded

Objective first-party measurement · 2026 Q3
03 / 08

Source categories — what feeds this score

Why this matters: Single-source review sites read very differently from the composite. Selection bias — only the loudest users self-report — is reduced here by aggregating across several sources. The category breakdown below shows the current mix and contribution without naming individual platforms. Methodology v2.1.

Current cell: 3 sources across 3 categories.

Category-level source contribution to this brand's score
CategorySrc.Distinct source feeds represented by this category in this market.SignalsReviews in this category that passed quality checks and fed the score.Filt.Reviews in this category excluded from the score as likely-fake or low-quality content.Scraped
Review platforms13402026-07-21
App stores1302026-07-10
Public forums101

Counts are grouped from the source rows in this market. Em-dashes mean no eligible signal exists in that category yet.

04 / 08
PayoutsWithdrawal delays reported→ steady16
SupportAccount suspension and delayed support responses→ steady10
KYCMultiple document requests and unclear KYC process→ steady10
BonusesBonus terms and availability concerns→ steady9
UXSlots glitching and sticking issues→ steady5

Clusters are counted signals, not a legal finding. A cluster reflects how often a theme recurs in public review text — it is not an adjudicated complaint, an allegation upheld, or proof of wrongdoing.

Rising, steady and easing describe changes in counted mentions during the displayed evidence window. They are not findings or predictions.

05 / 08

Brand destination

Bet St Georgeofficial website

External link · not a recommendationAbout this link

External link to the operator's own site. IndexFair does not recommend where you play or bet — we publish the score and leave the visit decision to you.

Official website
Frequently asked questionsexpand

Methodology FAQ

How is Bet St George rated?

Bet St George's overall IndexFair score is 5.5/10. It is computed from 57 signals across 3 sources, by a published formula — methodology v2.1.

Is Bet St George licensed in the United Kingdom?

Bet St George operates under a licence in the United Kingdom (current licence status on record: active). A licence reflects regulatory standing only — the IndexFair score adds user-experience and operational signals on top, so a licensed brand can still hold a low score.

How fast does Bet St George pay out?

Bet St George has 0 captured operator-stated processing windows for the United Kingdom (methodology v2.1). Bet St George has 0 payout-related signals in our dataset for this market — we do not publish a Payouts aspect score yet.

What are Bet St George's weak points?

There isn't enough per-aspect signal for Bet St George yet to single out a weakest aspect.

Why are some scores low but the brand is still licensed?

A UK Gambling Commission licence reflects regulatory standing — the operator meets statutory and conduct requirements. The IndexFair score additionally aggregates recorded review, complaint and operator-response signals. A licensed brand can hold a low composite when those measured signals are weaker without amounting to a regulatory sanction. The methodology page details the per-block weights.

Where does Bet St George's score come from?

Bet St George's score draws on 3 sources: app stores, public consumer-review aggregators, and the UK Gambling Commission register. The live pipeline combines the recorded raw signals using the published source-trust and time weights. The per-source breakdown is in the Sources section above and at /sources.

How often is Bet St George's score updated?

Scores recompute automatically whenever new review data, a licence-status change, or a methodology update arrives — typically within a few minutes, not on a daily schedule. Every brand card displays the 'last recomputed' timestamp. Methodology version changes are dated at /changelog.

What is the confidence interval?

The ±0.x bracket alongside a score is a 95% confidence interval derived from sample variance and effective sample size after time-decay. A score of 8.4 ± 0.3 reads as: 95% confidence that the true value lies in 8.1–8.7 given current evidence. Wider intervals indicate small samples or high source divergence between aggregators, not lower brand quality.

Can I trust this if it's automated?

The composite score is computed by a published formula, not editorial judgement — so the same inputs always produce the same output, and the formula is auditable. Methodology versions are append-only at /changelog with effective dates. Disputes route through /privacy/contact; the founder reviews factual disputes (licence status, regulator data). Aggregate review sentiment is not editable on a per-brand basis per source ToS.

Embed this scoreexpand
Embed this score

Show the verified IndexFair score on your site

A read-only badge that always reflects the live number and scale. It cannot be styled to imply a recommendation, and it links back to the full evidence.

iframe · 1 line · no tracking · updates daily
Badge preview
indexfair✓ signed
5.5/ 10
Bet St George
Independently rated by indexfair.com
Badge displays only what IndexFair publishes · inert · not a recommendation
light · also dark / compact

Branded search volume

Monthly search-volume estimate for brand-name queries in this market. Not a published-score input.

2026-07 · DataForSEO
2,930Core branded searches
10Promo branded searches
Score history · pre-ruler snapshot basis · last 90 days

Awaiting trend data

Quick facts2 facts
Regulator
UK Gambling Commission
Verticals
1
Related brands in this marketexpand
Brands cannot pay to change their score.no affiliate links · no paid placementPolicy
Operate this brand?Dispute this data

Routed to data-integrity, not sales. A correction can change a fact or freeze a number — it cannot remove a brand or alter its rank, and every change is logged in the append-only changelog.