Skip to main content

Betano

United Kingdom · Sports Betting + Online Casino
Licensed · GBScored · ranked
Evidence

The evidence behind this profile

What we hold on Betano, where it comes from, and how much of it cleared the bar to count. Start here, then move laterally into licence, complaints or the review-signal profile.

Betano's 6.2 is built from 466 usable signals, from 3 independent source categories.

Evidence coverage measures how much data supports the score. It is not a safety verdict.

✓ Licensed · UKGC3 source categoriesLast intake 19 Aug 2026 · 11:11 UTC
Not yet in the evidence base
  • Complaint clustersnone on file
  • Enforcement recordnone on file
  • First-party disclosuresnone on file
Score state
Scored · ranked
6.2 ±0.4 · IF-GB-SB-2
Licence
Licensed · UKGC
✓ verified 7 May 2026 · 14:25 UTC
Verified signals
296of 466 · 11 sources
Issue clusters
0last 90 days
Updated
19 Aug 2026 · 11:11 UTC
recomputed continuously
Coverage
100%source-category fill
Evidence window
21 May 2026 – 19 Aug 2026
Rolling 90-day observation window to last recompute

This is a licence, evidence and complaints profile — not a safety verdict. "Is Betano safe / legit?" is answered here with documented licence status, measured evidence and counted complaints. IndexFair issues no endorsement, recommendation or guarantee of any individual outcome.

Evidence ledger

What this score is

A source-weighted consumer-signal score from dated records, complaints, reported experiences, and measured facts. Not a star average and not a quality score. It does not reproduce full reviews; reported experience is not a finding of misconduct.

What this score is not

IndexFair scores evidence, not promises. A score for Betano is not an endorsement, certification, financial recommendation, gambling recommendation, safety guarantee, or prediction of future performance.

Key positive evidence
  • Regulator register
    Licensed · UKGC
    verified 7 May 2026 · 14:25 UTC
  • Enforcement record
    No enforcement events on the public register for this operator.
  • Review-derived signals
    11 sources · 296
Key negative evidence

None on file yet.

Missing evidence
  • Complaint clusters
  • Enforcement record
  • First-party disclosures

3 of 6 source categories · 64% of collected signals used · 2.0 of 2.0 independence floor

Operate this brand?Dispute this data· dispute register

What the evidence covers

source categories present / missing
Regulator register
UKGC public register
Review-derived signals
11 sources · 296
Complaint clusters
none on file
Enforcement record
none on file
Linked entities
1 on file
First-party disclosures
none on file

3 of 6 categories are populated. A score publishes only when the regulator and review-derived categories both clear their floors.

Collected466
Used in score29664% of collected
Set aside170filtered · see Reviews

Signals, not reviews. A signal is one gradeable observation extracted from a source; we never present the count as a review tally. The breakdown of what was set aside lives on the review-signal profile and the review-filtering methodology.

Sources

Source contributions (7)
Review platforms3151 used
App stores2119 used
Public forums14 used
Social media122 used

Continue in this profile