Skip to main content

BetMGM

United Kingdom · Sports Betting
Licensed · GBScored · ranked
Evidence

The evidence behind this profile

What we hold on BetMGM, where it comes from, and how much of it cleared the bar to count. Start here, then move laterally into licence, complaints or the review-signal profile.

BetMGM's 5.6 is built from 2,453 usable signals, from 4 independent source categories.

Evidence coverage measures how much data supports the score. It is not a safety verdict.

✓ Licensed · UKGC4 source categoriesLast intake 24 Aug 2026 · 06:47 UTC
Not yet in the evidence base
  • Complaint clustersnone on file
  • First-party disclosuresnone on file
Score state
Scored · ranked
5.6 ±0.4 · IF-GB-SB-2
Licence
Licensed · UKGC
✓ verified 7 May 2026 · 14:25 UTC
Verified signals
1,304of 2,453 · 6 sources
Issue clusters
0last 90 days
Updated
24 Aug 2026 · 06:47 UTC
recomputed continuously
Coverage
100%source-category fill
Evidence window
26 May 2026 – 24 Aug 2026
Rolling 90-day observation window to last recompute

This is a licence, evidence and complaints profile — not a safety verdict. "Is BetMGM safe / legit?" is answered here with documented licence status, measured evidence and counted complaints. IndexFair issues no endorsement, recommendation or guarantee of any individual outcome.

Evidence ledger

What this score is

A source-weighted consumer-signal score from dated records, complaints, reported experiences, and measured facts. Not a star average and not a quality score. It does not reproduce full reviews; reported experience is not a finding of misconduct.

What this score is not

IndexFair scores evidence, not promises. A score for BetMGM is not an endorsement, certification, financial recommendation, gambling recommendation, safety guarantee, or prediction of future performance.

Key positive evidence
  • Regulator register
    Licensed · UKGC
    verified 7 May 2026 · 14:25 UTC
  • Review-derived signals
    6 sources · 1,304
Key negative evidence
  • Enforcement record
    1 event(s) on the public register
Missing evidence
  • Complaint clusters
  • First-party disclosures

4 of 6 source categories · 53% of collected signals used · 2.0 of 2.0 independence floor

Operate this brand?Dispute this data· dispute register

What the evidence covers

source categories present / missing
Regulator register
UKGC public register
Review-derived signals
6 sources · 1,304
Complaint clusters
none on file
Enforcement record
1 event
Linked entities
1 on file
First-party disclosures
none on file

4 of 6 categories are populated. A score publishes only when the regulator and review-derived categories both clear their floors.

Collected2,453
Used in score1,30453% of collected
Set aside1,149filtered · see Reviews

Signals, not reviews. A signal is one gradeable observation extracted from a source; we never present the count as a review tally. The breakdown of what was set aside lives on the review-signal profile and the review-filtering methodology.

Sources

Source contributions (4)
Review platforms1227 used
App stores21,030 used
Public forums147 used

Continue in this profile