Kaspersky
United Kingdom · AntivirusThe evidence behind this profile
What we hold on Kaspersky, where it comes from, and how much of it cleared the bar to count. Start here, then move laterally into licence, complaints or the review-signal profile.
Kaspersky's facts profile contains 142 collected signals across 2 populated source categories.
This facts-only scale publishes evidence without a 0–10 rating. Coverage is not a safety verdict.
- Regulator register — none on file
- Enforcement record — none on file
- Linked entities — none on file
- First-party disclosures — none on file
This is a licence, evidence and complaints profile — not a safety verdict. "Is Kaspersky safe / legit?" is answered here with documented licence status, measured evidence and counted complaints. IndexFair issues no endorsement, recommendation or guarantee of any individual outcome.
Evidence ledger
Documented regulatory standing, verified evidence signals, source coverage, and complaint clusters currently on file.
It is not a rating, endorsement, financial recommendation, safety guarantee, or prediction of future performance.
- Review-derived signals3 sources · 41
- Complaint clustersreview-mined · 4
- Support provides generic responses and no weekend availability27 mentions in rolling 90-day window
- Installation and renewal issues causing data loss24 mentions in rolling 90-day window
- Refund and billing issues after cancellation23 mentions in rolling 90-day window
- Regulator register
- Enforcement record
- Linked entities
- First-party disclosures
2 of 6 source categories · 41 of 142 collected signals verified for this profile
What the evidence covers
source categories present / missing2 of 6 evidence categories are populated. Missing categories remain visible; no rating is issued on this scale.
Signal basis
Full review-signal profile →Signals, not reviews. A signal is one gradeable observation extracted from a source; we never present the count as a review tally. The breakdown of what was set aside lives on the review-signal profile and the review-filtering methodology.