/nl/crypto/wallet · wallet ranking · methodology v2.1

The trust picture for crypto wallets in Netherlands

Independent composite scores synthesised from public review feeds and regulatory data, pinned to methodology v2.1.

Trust snapshot· the rigour behind the ranking

How we score →

brands rated

signals analysed

0 filtered · spam / low-quality

pending

last update

Scales in this marketnot comparable across verticals

Scale cards appear once this market has a ranked cohort.

What we measure

SARSecurity architecture
IHIIncident history
RRERecovery resilience
CBRChain breadth
SQUSupport quality

Anatomy of a scored ranking row

Every part of a ranked row maps to one data field. The row is the same component used across all scored leaderboards.

Show row anatomy

#PartWhat it is · source field

1RankWithin-scale position only — never cross-scale. rank_in_scale

2Brand tileDeterministic initials, neutral ink. No logo, no affiliate signal. brand.slug

Security consensus · Block A

Wallets have no single licence register. Block A is a multi-source consensus: independent vendor certifications (Common Criteria EAL), security audits, and incident history, weighted by source independence and asserted only when independent sources corroborate. A breach on a credible primary registers on its own; positive signals require agreement. Thin or divergent evidence is held toward a neutral prior rather than penalised.

No rating is issued on this scale — IndexFair publishes verified facts, sources, and status here, not a number. By design, not by gap.

18 crypto wallets listedA–Z · not ranked18 with complaint clusters

BitBoxCrypto wallet
9 complaintssources pending
Evidence
Regulatory standing No public registerfacts only · no rating