Skip to main content

Bitstamp

United Kingdom · Crypto Exchange
Evidence

The evidence behind this profile

What we hold on Bitstamp, where it comes from, and how much of it cleared the bar to count. Start here, then move laterally into licence, complaints or the review-signal profile.

Bitstamp's facts profile contains 898 collected signals across 4 populated source categories.

This facts-only scale publishes evidence without a 0–10 rating. Coverage is not a safety verdict.

✓ Licensed · FCA-CRYPTO4 source categoriesLast intake —
Not yet in the evidence base
  • Enforcement recordnone on file
  • First-party disclosuresnone on file
Profile state
Facts only
no number published in this state
Licence
Licensed · FCA-CRYPTO
✓ verified 8 Jun 2026 · 07:19 UTC
Verified signals
516of 898 · 5 sources
Issue clusters
3last 90 days
Updated
recomputed continuously
Coverage
67%source-category fill
Evidence window
22 Jul 2026 – 22 Jul 2026
Derived from issue-cluster observation dates · 60-day clusterer window

This is a licence, evidence and complaints profile — not a safety verdict. "Is Bitstamp safe / legit?" is answered here with documented licence status, measured evidence and counted complaints. IndexFair issues no endorsement, recommendation or guarantee of any individual outcome.

Evidence ledger

What this profile contains

Documented regulatory standing, verified evidence signals, source coverage, and complaint clusters currently on file.

What this profile does not claim

It is not a rating, endorsement, financial recommendation, safety guarantee, or prediction of future performance.

Key positive evidence
  • Regulator register
    Licensed · FCA-CRYPTO
    verified 8 Jun 2026 · 07:19 UTC
  • Enforcement record
    No enforcement events on the public register for this operator.
  • Review-derived signals
    5 sources · 516
Key negative evidence
  • KYC verification requiring video interview and extensive documents
    2 mentions in rolling 60-day window
  • Undisclosed deposit restrictions and withdrawal fees
    2 mentions in rolling 60-day window
  • Support escalation path and supervisor access unavailable
    1 mentions in rolling 60-day window
Missing evidence
  • Enforcement record
  • First-party disclosures

4 of 6 source categories · 516 of 898 collected signals verified for this profile

Operate this brand?Dispute this data· dispute register

What the evidence covers

source categories present / missing
Regulator register
FCA-CRYPTO public register
Review-derived signals
5 sources · 516
Complaint clusters
review-mined · 3
Enforcement record
none on file
Linked entities
1 on file
First-party disclosures
none on file

4 of 6 evidence categories are populated. Missing categories remain visible; no rating is issued on this scale.

Collected898
Verified for profile51657% of collected
Set aside382filtered · see Reviews

Signals, not reviews. A signal is one gradeable observation extracted from a source; we never present the count as a review tally. The breakdown of what was set aside lives on the review-signal profile and the review-filtering methodology.

Sources

Source contributions (3)
Review platforms197 verified
App stores1416 verified
Public forums13 verified

Continue in this profile