Skip to main content

Crypto.com

UK · Exchange

All markets tracked for Crypto.com
Overall score

No overall score is published for this exchange in this market. The score is withheld for legal-perimeter reasons, not because of an evidence gap. The category methodology is not yet certified.

Regulatory standingFCA-registered (AML) ✓FCA registration (AML) — not solvency, custody, or conduct.
Official website
crypto.comVerification pending

The destination has not yet been matched to a current register record.

External link · not a recommendationAbout this link

External link to the operator's own site. IndexFair does not recommend where you play or bet — we publish the score and leave the visit decision to you.

Evidence snapshot · no rating issued

This profile publishes the source-backed evidence categories shown below. It does not turn those facts into a numerical rating on this scale.

Evidence
7,701usable signals16,898 collected
4sources on filenamed in evidence
6complaint clusterstracked evidence

How 16,898 collected signals became 10,188 usable ones:

Signal funnel60% verified
Collected from all sources16,898
Met detail/relevance bar10,188
Set aside6,710
Set aside · 6,710
No gradeable aspect3,102
Too short to verify2,098
Likely fake or duplicate1,074
Verified for profile · 4 sources10,188

10,188 of 16,898 collected reviews met our detail and relevance bar and were verified for this profile. The remaining 6,710 were set aside before publication — too short, off-topic, non-English, or flagged as likely fake.

Score summary

About this score

010

No overall score is published for this market — facts only.

Evidence base
18,482 signals / 658 filtered
Review sources
4 sources
Component grade
Not yet graded

Regulatory compliance grade (register / licence tier).

Attestations
None recorded
Updated
2026-07-31 · 03:20 UTC

No regulator-grade source covers exchange solvency or conduct; the strongest independent anchor is AML-only registration.

Measured product · Crypto exchange
Aspect weights: (proposed)
Registration recordweight
registered

jurisdiction: US · vertical: exchange

state_mtl_register · OFFICIAL_REGISTRY_RECORD · 2026-06-18 · REGISTRY_RECORDEDSource record
Registration recordweight
registered

jurisdiction: CA · vertical: exchange

csa_ciro_crypto_register · OFFICIAL_REGISTRY_RECORD · 2026-06-18 · REGISTRY_RECORDEDSource record

Measured facts feed methodology review only — not a published composite until the vertical catalogue is frozen. Methodology

03 / 08

Source categories — what feeds this score

Why this matters: Single-source review sites read very differently from the composite. Selection bias — only the loudest users self-report — is reduced here by aggregating across several sources. The category breakdown below shows the current mix and contribution without naming individual platforms. Methodology v2.1.

Current cell: 4 sources across 3 categories.

Category-level source contribution to this brand's score
CategorySrc.Distinct source feeds represented by this category in this market.SignalsReviews in this category that passed quality checks and fed the score.Filt.Reviews in this category excluded from the score as likely-fake or low-quality content.Scraped
Review platforms16,0612302026-07-25
App stores27,3312,8742026-07-25
Public forums133568

Counts are grouped from the source rows in this market. Em-dashes mean no eligible signal exists in that category yet.

04 / 08
Unresponsive support: calls dropped, chat broken, no reply >72h→ steady89
Account lock and withdrawal difficulties→ steady61
App technical issues and account access problems→ steady16
Unexpected service/inactivity fees and unresponsive support→ steady13
KYC verification delay and excessive personal data requests→ steady13
Withdrawal restrictions and inability to transfer funds→ steady11

Clusters are counted signals, not a legal finding. A cluster reflects how often a theme recurs in public review text — it is not an adjudicated complaint, an allegation upheld, or proof of wrongdoing.

Rising, steady and easing describe changes in counted mentions during the displayed evidence window. They are not findings or predictions.

Frequently asked questionsexpand

Methodology FAQ

How is Crypto.com rated?

We don't yet have enough verified signal to publish a score for Crypto.com. The page shows what we've collected so far: 18,482 signals.

What regulatory standing does Crypto.com have in the United Kingdom?

Crypto.com is registered or licensed under FCA-CRYPTO in the United Kingdom. IndexFair's Block-A regulatory grade is not yet graded. A registration reflects regulatory standing only — the IndexFair score adds user-experience signals on top, so a registered brand can still hold a low score.

What are Crypto.com's strongest and weakest service aspects?

There isn't enough per-aspect signal for Crypto.com yet to identify aspect scores.

How long do Crypto.com exchange withdrawals take?

Crypto.com has 0 captured operator-stated processing windows for the United Kingdom (methodology v2.1). Crypto.com has 0 payout-related signals in our dataset for this market — we do not publish a Payouts aspect score yet.

How is Crypto.com's reserve transparency evaluated?

Block-A regulatory data for Crypto.com has not yet been fully captured. Reserve transparency will be scored once attestations are collected.

Where does Crypto.com's score come from?

Crypto.com's score draws on 4 sources: consumer-review aggregators, app stores, and the regulatory register for this market. The live pipeline combines the recorded raw signals using the published source-trust and time weights. The per-source breakdown is in the Sources section above.

How often is Crypto.com's score updated?

Scores recompute automatically whenever new review data, a status change, or a methodology update arrives — typically within a few minutes, not on a daily schedule. Every brand page displays the "last recomputed" timestamp. Methodology version changes are dated at /changelog.

What is the confidence interval shown on the score?

The ±0.x bracket is a 95% confidence interval derived from sample variance and effective sample size after time-decay. A score of 8.4 ± 0.3 reads as: 95% confidence the true value lies in 8.1–8.7 given current evidence. Wider intervals indicate small samples or high source divergence.

Can I trust an automated exchange rating?

The score is computed by a published formula, not editorial judgement — the same inputs always produce the same output and the formula is auditable. Methodology versions are append-only at /changelog with effective dates. Disputes route through /privacy/contact; the founder reviews factual disputes (regulatory data, attestation status).

Branded search volume

IndexFair monthly search-volume estimate for brand-name queries in this market. Not a published-score input.

2026-07
5,990Core branded searches
50Promo branded searches
Quick facts1 fact
Verticals
2
Brands cannot pay to change their facts profile.no affiliate links · no paid placementPolicy
Operate this brand?Dispute this data

Routed to data-integrity, not sales. A correction can change a fact or freeze a number — it cannot remove a brand or alter its rank, and every change is logged in the append-only changelog.