Skip to main content

Crypto.com

United Kingdom · Crypto Wallet + Crypto Exchange
Evidence

The evidence behind this profile

What we hold on Crypto.com, where it comes from, and how much of it cleared the bar to count. Start here, then move laterally into licence, complaints or the review-signal profile.

Crypto.com's facts profile contains 10,238 collected signals across 3 populated source categories.

This facts-only scale publishes evidence without a 0–10 rating. Coverage is not a safety verdict.

✓ Licensed · FCA-CRYPTO3 source categoriesLast intake —
Not yet in the evidence base
  • Complaint clustersnone on file
  • Enforcement recordnone on file
  • First-party disclosuresnone on file
Profile state
Facts only
no number published in this state
Licence
Licensed · FCA-CRYPTO
✓ verified 8 Jun 2026 · 07:19 UTC
Verified signals
5,234of 10,238 · 6 sources
Issue clusters
0last 90 days
Updated
recomputed continuously
Coverage
50%source-category fill
Evidence window
Window not yet established
Rolling 90-day observation window to last recompute

This is a licence, evidence and complaints profile — not a safety verdict. "Is Crypto.com safe / legit?" is answered here with documented licence status, measured evidence and counted complaints. IndexFair issues no endorsement, recommendation or guarantee of any individual outcome.

Evidence ledger

What this profile contains

Documented regulatory standing, verified evidence signals, source coverage, and complaint clusters currently on file.

What this profile does not claim

It is not a rating, endorsement, financial recommendation, safety guarantee, or prediction of future performance.

Key positive evidence
  • Regulator register
    Licensed · FCA-CRYPTO
    verified 8 Jun 2026 · 07:19 UTC
  • Enforcement record
    No enforcement events on the public register for this operator.
  • Review-derived signals
    6 sources · 5,234
Key negative evidence

None on file yet.

Missing evidence
  • Complaint clusters
  • Enforcement record
  • First-party disclosures

3 of 6 source categories · 5,234 of 10,238 collected signals verified for this profile

Operate this brand?Dispute this data· dispute register

What the evidence covers

source categories present / missing
Regulator register
FCA-CRYPTO public register
Review-derived signals
6 sources · 5,234
Complaint clusters
none on file
Enforcement record
none on file
Linked entities
1 on file
First-party disclosures
none on file

3 of 6 evidence categories are populated. Missing categories remain visible; no rating is issued on this scale.

Collected10,238
Verified for profile5,23451% of collected
Set aside5,004filtered · see Reviews

Signals, not reviews. A signal is one gradeable observation extracted from a source; we never present the count as a review tally. The breakdown of what was set aside lives on the review-signal profile and the review-filtering methodology.

Sources

Source contributions (3)
Review platforms12,842 verified
App stores12,243 verified
Public forums1149 verified

Continue in this profile