Skip to main content

Paddy Power

IndexFair evidence rating

Calculated from independent public evidence — not an average of customer ratings.

5.5 out of 10 on the cohort ruler.
5.2–5.9 likely rangeprovisional · transitional certification basis

In the middle third of the 28 UK sportsbook brands we rank.

Collection degradedSome planned review sources are not connected yet
paddypower.com

The brand’s own website. It is not a regulator record and is not checked against a register.

Review evidence used: 1,390 (recorded snapshot)4 source categoriesupdated 10 Sept 2026method v2.1
Technical details
Comparison
A scale is one country, one category and one version of the method. Scores from two different scales are not comparable.
Percentile
64th percentile within UK sportsbook (among 28 brands)
Confidence
normal · estimated margin 0.4 points
What this means
The interval shows how much the score may move as more evidence arrives. A wider interval means the current evidence base is thinner or less consistent.

Per-vertical · two separate scales — not comparable to each other

Online Casino
5.4
56 percentile · among 36 brands
Sports Betting
5.55.25.9
64 percentile · among 28 brands

Footnote: each vertical is read only against its own cohort.

scores higher than 56% of UK casino brands — a position, not a gradescores higher than 64% of UK sportsbook brands — a position, not a grade
Online Casino5.4· n=1,939Sports Betting5.5· n=1,939

calibrated against 28 ranked peers

All markets tracked for Paddy Power
Weights inherited from another market
The weights behind this score were derived in another market and reused here. They have not been certified for this country and category.

Paddy Power is a sports betting and online casino licensed in the United Kingdom. Its IndexFair score is 5.5/10 — better than 64% of the United Kingdom sports betting brands, drawn from 1,390 reviews used out of 3,300 collected. Its highest overall-aligned public aspect projection is UX (6.1/10 · +0.6 vs overall) and its lowest is KYC (5.0/10 · −0.6 vs overall).

What moves this score

Top 5 measured aspects

Every value below is projected, not standalone — what the published score would be if only this aspect’s evidence moved. How projections are built →

  • UX6.1projected0.6 above overall
  • KYC5.0projected0.6 below overall
  • Payouts5.2projected0.3 below overall
  • Support5.2projected0.3 below overall
  • Bonuses Fairness5.4projected0.1 below overall
Score decompositionComposite 5.5
ALicence & complianceWhat registers and regulators show — licence status, enforcement history, complaints on record.UK Gambling Commission recordweight —9.1
BUser experienceWhat review sources report — review signals screened for spam and weighted for time.n 1,390 used · 1,910 filtered outweight —3.2

Experience signals for this market draw on the brand’s review evidence across markets; region-attributed reviews alone are not yet numerous enough (fewer than 30) to score this market separately.

COperationsWhat operators do when things go wrong — reply to negative reviews and resolve logged complaints.weight —0.0
Independent review sources disagree on this brand — a confidence signal, not scored into the composite. See where →

Review evidence

the United Kingdom · Sports Betting. Recorded score-row census; the collection period is not recorded.

Collected review documentsReview documents recorded for this cell.3,300
Recorded as usedReview documents recorded as used in the score row.1,390
RemainderCollected documents outside this read’s used count; individual reasons are not itemised here.1,910
1,390 + 1,910 = 3,300
Source categories
1,390 of 3,300 review documents — see review evidence.

Source categories — what feeds this score

Why this matters: Single-source review sites read very differently from the composite. Selection bias — only the loudest users self-report — is reduced here by aggregating across several sources. The category breakdown below shows the current mix and contribution without naming individual platforms. Methodology v2.1.

Current cell: 8 sources across 4 categories.

Category-level source contribution to this brand's score
CategorySrc.SignalsFilt.
Review platforms449257
App stores21,396633
Public forums128719
Social media14142

Counts are grouped from the source rows in this market. Em-dashes mean no eligible signal exists in that category yet.

Aspect breakdown

6 brand-level experience dimensions · methodology weights

Experience

across sportsbook + casino
UX · w 42%#ux-quality
UX quality
overall-aligned projection: 6.1 of 10, +0.6 vs overall
+0.6 vs overall831 signals
IndexFair analysis

User interface is described as clean and straightforward by multiple reviewers, though reports also cite server errors and concerns about game payout consistency.

PAY · w 26%#payouts
Payouts
overall-aligned projection: 5.2 of 10, −0.3 vs overall
−0.3 vs overall273 signals
IndexFair analysis

Withdrawal experiences vary: some users report rapid processing, while others describe account restrictions preventing access to winnings above £1,000.

BON · w 12%#bonuses-fairness
Bonuses Fairness
overall-aligned projection: 5.4 of 10, −0.1 vs overall
−0.1 vs overall351 signals
INDEXFAIR

The reading above is drawn from 351 signals. IndexFair has not published an analysis of this dimension for this brand yet.

SUP · w 9%#support
Support
overall-aligned projection: 5.2 of 10, −0.3 vs overall
−0.3 vs overall332 signals
IndexFair analysis

Customer support experiences are polarized: some users report immediate resolution, while others describe unresponsive channels, multiple escalations without resolution, and reliance on social media to obtain replies.

KYC · w 6%#kyc-verification
KYC
overall-aligned projection: 5.0 of 10, −0.6 vs overall
−0.6 vs overall102 signals
IndexFair analysis

KYC verification processes result in account suspension and repeated document requests; users report rejection of legitimate utility bills and address proofs, and requests for documents already submitted during account creation.

Responsible gambling
overall-aligned projection: 5.5 of 10, ±0.0 vs overall
±0.0 vs overall50 signals
IndexFair analysis

Deposit limit features are reported as functional by some users, though others describe limits being activated without user action, difficulty reinstating raised limits, and concerns that limits correlate with reduced winning outcomes.

SupportSupport wait time and resolution outcome→ steady18
PayoutsBlocked withdrawals and low payouts→ steady11
BonusesBonus honouring and triggering issues→ steady9
UXWebsite/app errors and functionality issues→ steady6
KYCKYC verification document rejection and multiple ID requests→ steady5
Responsible gamblingResponsible gambling measures: suspension, caps, and messaging→ steady5

Clusters are counted signals, not a legal finding. A cluster reflects how often a theme recurs in public review text — it is not an adjudicated complaint, an allegation upheld, or proof of wrongdoing.

Rising, steady and easing describe changes in counted mentions during the displayed evidence window. They are not findings or predictions.

Online Casino

scores higher than 56% of UK casino brands — a position, not a grade
Expected range 5.05.8

Independent analysis of public signals; no affiliation or endorsement.

How we calculate

A source-weighted consumer-signal score from dated records, complaints, reported experiences, and measured facts. Not a star average and not a quality score. It does not reproduce full reviews; reported experience is not a finding of misconduct. Full methodology.

1,939 observations
Measured product
Providers detected
12listedsample from measured catalogue
Provider mix
Moderatemeasured by IndexFair · coverage-weighted mix
Game variety
13Comprehensivegame categories
Providers present
Blue Print GamingCayetanoCore GamingGamecodeGames GlobalInspired GamingOctoplayPlayson
+4 more
Objective first-party measurement · 2026 Q3 · feeds the Online Casino scoreHow the casino score is measured

Sports Betting

scores higher than 64% of UK sportsbook brands — a position, not a grade
Expected range 5.25.9

Independent analysis of public signals; no affiliation or endorsement.

How we calculate

A source-weighted consumer-signal score from dated records, complaints, reported experiences, and measured facts. Not a star average and not a quality score. It does not reproduce full reviews; reported experience is not a finding of misconduct. Full methodology.

8 sources
Measured product
Market margin
6.4%Goodoverround · lower is better · Measured on Tennis

Market breadth not yet measured for this sportsbook.

Objective first-party measurement · 2026 Q3 · feeds the Sports Betting scoreHow margin and breadth are measured

Brand destination

Paddy Powerofficial website

Not a recommendation · About this link

Frequently asked questionsexpand

Methodology FAQ

How is Paddy Power rated?

Paddy Power’s overall IndexFair score is 5.5/10 — better than 64% of the United Kingdom sports betting brands. It is computed by the published formula — methodology v2.1. The evidence base on this page gives the collected and used counts and their scope.

Is Paddy Power licensed in the United Kingdom?

Paddy Power operates under a licence in the United Kingdom (current licence status on record: active). A licence reflects regulatory standing only — the IndexFair score adds user-experience and operational signals on top, so a licensed brand can still hold a low score.

How fast does Paddy Power pay out?

No operator-stated processing window is available in this answer for Paddy Power in the United Kingdom (methodology v2.1). On payout-related evidence, Paddy Power's overall-aligned public aspect projection is 5.2/10 (−0.3 vs overall), supported by 273 signals. Withdrawal-delay complaint totals are not available in this answer.

What are Paddy Power's weak points?

Paddy Power's lowest overall-aligned public aspect projection is KYC at 5.0/10 (−0.6 vs overall), supported by 102 signals. This is a counterfactual published score with the other blocks and market ruler held fixed, so it can differ from the overall score. The full breakdown is in the score section above.

Why are some scores low but the brand is still licensed?

A UK Gambling Commission licence reflects regulatory standing — the operator meets statutory and conduct requirements. The IndexFair score additionally aggregates recorded review, complaint and operator-response signals. A licensed brand can hold a low composite when those measured signals are weaker without amounting to a regulatory sanction. The methodology page details the per-block weights.

Where does Paddy Power's score come from?

The Sources section on this page lists the recorded sources for Paddy Power and their contribution counts. These counts describe their own evidence scope; they are not an additional total for the overall score.

How often is Paddy Power's score updated?

Scores recompute automatically whenever new review data, a licence-status change, or a methodology update arrives — typically within a few minutes, not on a daily schedule. Every brand card displays the 'last recomputed' timestamp. Methodology version changes are dated at /changelog.

What is the confidence interval?

The ±0.x bracket alongside a score is a 95% confidence interval derived from sample variance and effective sample size after time-decay. A score of 8.4 ± 0.3 reads as: 95% confidence that the true value lies in 8.1–8.7 given current evidence. Wider intervals indicate small samples or high source divergence between aggregators, not lower brand quality.

Can I trust this if it's automated?

The composite score is computed by a published formula, not editorial judgement — so the same inputs always produce the same output, and the formula is auditable. Methodology versions are append-only at /changelog with effective dates. Disputes route through /privacy/contact; the founder reviews factual disputes (licence status, regulator data). Aggregate review sentiment is not editable on a per-brand basis per source ToS.

Cite or embedexpand

Cite or embed this score

IndexFair. Paddy Power · UK sports betting · 5.5/10 · method 2.1Embed a live score badge 
Related brands in this marketexpand
Brands cannot pay to change their score.no affiliate links · no paid placementPolicy
Operate this brand?Dispute this data

Routed to data-integrity, not sales. A correction can change a fact or freeze a number — it cannot remove a brand or alter its rank, and every change is logged in the append-only changelog.