Skip to main content

DraftKings

United States · Sportsbook + Casino
Scored · ranked
Evidence

The evidence behind this profile

What we hold on DraftKings, where it comes from, and how much of it cleared the bar to count. Start here, then move laterally into licence, complaints or the review-signal profile.

DraftKings's 5.4 is built from 35,967 usable signals, from 2 independent source categories.

Evidence coverage measures how much data supports the score. It is not a safety verdict.

2 source categoriesLast intake 1 day ago
Not yet in the evidence base
  • Regulator registernone on file
  • Enforcement recordnone on file
  • Linked entitiesnone on file
  • First-party disclosuresnone on file
Score state
Scored · ranked
5.4 ±0.3 · IF-US-SB-2
Licence
No licence on file
Verified signals
16,027of 35,967 · 9 sources
Issue clusters
4last 90 days
Updated
1 day ago
recomputed continuously
Coverage
100%source-category fill
Evidence window
Jul 24, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026
Derived from issue-cluster observation dates · 90-day clusterer window

This is a licence, evidence and complaints profile — not a safety verdict. "Is DraftKings safe / legit?" is answered here with documented licence status, measured evidence and counted complaints. IndexFair issues no endorsement, recommendation or guarantee of any individual outcome.

Evidence ledger

What this score is

A source-weighted consumer-signal score from dated records, complaints, reported experiences, and measured facts. Not a star average and not a quality score. It does not reproduce full reviews; reported experience is not a finding of misconduct.

What this score is not

IndexFair scores evidence, not promises. A score for DraftKings is not an endorsement, certification, financial recommendation, gambling recommendation, safety guarantee, or prediction of future performance.

Key positive evidence
  • Review-derived signals
    9 sources · 16,027
  • Complaint clusters
    review-mined · 4
Key negative evidence
  • Mixed user experience feedback
    64 mentions in rolling 90-day window
    UX
  • Inconsistent bonus availability and value
    20 mentions in rolling 90-day window
    Bonuses Fairness
  • Inquiry about Big League Draw promotion
    7 mentions in rolling 90-day window
Missing evidence
  • Regulator register
  • Enforcement record
  • Linked entities
  • First-party disclosures

2 of 6 source categories · 45% of collected signals used · 2.0 of 2.0 independence floor

Operate this brand?Dispute this data· dispute register

What the evidence covers

source categories present / missing
Regulator register
none on file
Review-derived signals
9 sources · 16,027
Complaint clusters
review-mined · 4
Enforcement record
none on file
Linked entities
none on file
First-party disclosures
none on file

2 of 6 categories are populated. A score publishes only when the regulator and review-derived categories both clear their floors.

Collected35,967
Used in score16,02745% of collected
Set aside19,940filtered · see Reviews

Signals, not reviews. A signal is one gradeable observation extracted from a source; we never present the count as a review tally. The breakdown of what was set aside lives on the review-signal profile and the review-filtering methodology.

Sources

Source contributions (5)
Review platforms1122 used
App stores215,828 used
Public forums159 used
Social media118 used

Continue in this profile