PT · Wallet
Experiential evidence below our publication floor — no overall rating is published for this brand yet. Here is what we do know.
1 independent security attestation on record.
External link to the operator's own site. IndexFair does not recommend where you play or bet — we publish the score and leave the visit decision to you.
Not yet rated
Dimensions are scored 0–10 from review evidence. The overall score also includes licensing and complaint history, so it can differ from any single dimension.
How 0 collected signals became 0 usable ones:
Per-class breakdown available after the next recompute.
No overall score is published for this market — facts only.
Security attestation grade (published audit coverage).
No regulator-grade source covers wallet custody or conduct; the strongest independent signal is a consensus of security attestations.
| SourceSource | SignalsSignals — Reviews from this source that passed quality checks and fed the score. | Filt.Filtered — Reviews from this source excluded from the score as likely-fake or low-quality content. | ScoreScore — Weighted-mean aspect score from this source on the 0–10 scale, mirroring the Block B aggregator math. | Wt.Weight — Editorial weight of this source in the composite score. Set per source in the methodology configuration. | ScrapedLast scrape | DomainDomain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apple App Store review aggregator | 171 | 29 | 7.3 | 1.00 | 2026-07-03 | apps.apple.com (opens in new tab) |
Google Play review aggregator | 2,302 | 1,231 | 7.3 | 1.00 | 2026-07-07 | play.google.com (opens in new tab) |
Reddit review aggregator | 771 | 206 | 3.2 | 1.00 | — | reddit.com (opens in new tab) |
Trustpilot review aggregator | 130 | 47 | 5.2 | 0.70 | 2026-06-22 | trustpilot.com (opens in new tab) |
Per-source score mirrors the user-experience block on this source's signal slice; weight is set editorially per source. Em-dashes mean the source has no eligible signal yet — typically configured but not yet scraped.
Clusters are counted signals, not a legal finding. A cluster reflects how often a theme recurs in public review text — it is not an adjudicated complaint, an allegation upheld, or proof of wrongdoing.
Trend kind: critical = mention rate growing AND in top quartile of severity-weighted clusters · ongoing = mention rate stable, persists across windows · improving = mention rate declining ≥30% vs prior 90-day window. Derived per cluster by classifier v1.3.0.
Tangem — official website
External link to the operator's own site. IndexFair does not recommend where you play or bet — we publish the score and leave the visit decision to you.
We don't yet have enough verified signal to publish a score for Tangem. The page shows what we've collected so far: 0 signals across 4 sources.
Tangem has 1 published security audit attestation, yielding a Block-A score of 6.1/10. Wallets are register-less — there is no licence to verify; the grade derives entirely from third-party audit attestations (smart-contract / protocol review).
There isn't enough per-aspect signal for Tangem yet to identify aspect scores.
Tangem's Block-A security grade (a Block-A score of 6.1/10) draws on 1 published audit attestation. Audit attestations cover smart-contract / protocol review; they are factual attestations, not a guarantee of security.
Tangem's score draws on 4 sources: consumer-review aggregators, app stores, and the regulatory register for this market. Signals are combined with inverse-propensity correction — re-weighting so over-represented voices don't dominate. The per-source breakdown with weights is in the Sources section above.
Scores recompute automatically whenever new review data, a status change, or a methodology update arrives — typically within a few minutes, not on a daily schedule. Every brand page displays the "last recomputed" timestamp. Methodology version changes are dated at /changelog.
The ±0.x bracket is a 95% confidence interval derived from sample variance and effective sample size after time-decay. A score of 8.4 ± 0.3 reads as: 95% confidence the true value lies in 8.1–8.7 given current evidence. Wider intervals indicate small samples or high source divergence.
The score is computed by a published formula, not editorial judgement — the same inputs always produce the same output and the formula is auditable. Methodology versions are append-only at /changelog with effective dates. Disputes route through /privacy/contact; the methodology committee reviews factual disputes (regulatory data, attestation status).
No public score to embed yet.
Routed to data-integrity, not sales. A correction can change a fact or freeze a number — it cannot remove a brand or alter its rank, and every change is logged in the append-only changelog.